Flat Belly Diet Warning – Case Study Reveals Major Doubts

  • Bookmark this on Hatena Bookmark
  • Hatena Bookmark - Flat Belly Diet Warning – Case Study Reveals Major Doubts
  • Share on Facebook
  • Post to Google Buzz
  • Bookmark this on Yahoo Bookmark
  • Bookmark this on Livedoor Clip
  • Share on FriendFeed

Probably the most current health trend will be the Flat Belly Diet and the idea of “Belly Flattening Foods.”
Recently there continues to be a plenty of person to person about a thing referred to as the Flat Belly Diet that has food items that are supposed to be able to use up tummy fat. This particular belly fat – aka visceral extra fat – dwells within abdominal cavity which enables it to surround and impact the function of internal organs, which makes tummy fat possibly far more dangerous compared to subcutaneous fat. Subcutaneous fat is the thing that constitutes the dreaded “spare tire” or maybe “beer belly” that almost all people are long-familiar with.
The Flat Belly Diet was developed in response to research carried out in Spain whereby 11 obese individuals who were progeny of diabetics, were given three contrasting diets containing the equal amount of calories each with an alternative concoction of carbohydrates as well as fat . One diet was saturated in carbohydrates, one diet was full of saturated fats and one diet was full of monounsaturated fats. People spend 4-weeks on each diet.
Based on Prevention Magazine the promoters of the Flat Belly Diet, researchers ascertained that the individuals who consumed the diet very high in monounsaturated fats lost a bit more weight with no extra exercise. However, in interpreting conclusions posted in the particular study, this declaration is dubious. Here’s what the study tells us, body composition, “RESULTS- Weight, and resting energy expenditure stayed unaltered during the 3 sequential dietary periods.”
And while the Flat Belly Diet puts forward that a diet high in monounsaturated fats cuts down visceral fat and fat, here is what is published in the study. “Using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry we found that when patients have been given a CHO-enriched diet (carbohydrates), their fat mass was redistributed toward the abdominal depot, whereas periphery fat accumulation decreased in comparison with isocaloric MUFA-rich (monounsaturated fats) and high-SAT (saturated oils) diets.”
What this signifies – despite the propaganda spread by the okinawa flat belly tonic customer service number (click the following page) Belly Diet – is that the monounsaturated and saturated fat diets resulted in less “stomach fat” accumulation than did the high carb diet programs. The investigators also clearly state that weight as well as unwanted fat percentage were unaltered as a consequence of all 3 diet interventions.
Here is the conclusion as published in the study, “CONCLUSIONS An isocaloric MUFA-rich diet plan stops main fat redistribution and the postprandial drop in peripheral adiponectin gene expression and insulin resistance caused by a CHO-rich diet in insulin resistant subjects.”
And so in spite of the claims from the advocators of the Flat Belly Diet, consuming a diet very high in monounsaturated oils had virtually no effect on slimming or excess fat percentage, and a diet loaded with fats that are saturated was equally helpful as the monounsaturated diet regime in preventing visceral – belly – fat from accumulating. And these results are found in those who were overweight and the offspring of diabetes patients. Not exactly life changing results can they be?

Tags: , ,

Comments are closed.